Archive for June, 2008

When researching different Web 2.0 tools for distance learning, I came across a site I had never heard before.  Innertoob is a tool that allows your podcasts to be marked at certain points.  This allows listeners to be more engaged.  I would recommend watching the Toobcasting video tutorial to learn more about this if you currently employ podcasts in your classroom. 

This has great implications for distance learning.  Interactivity between instructor and student would be more readily possible with Innertoob.  Podcasts are a great tool for distance learning instructors to use for auditory learners.  What would be even better though is to ask questions at certain points of the podcast easily without disrupting the flow of the podcast or having to tell a specific time during the podcast in which to pay closer attention.  With Innertoob, this would be simple because it creates a timeline or tracking device at the bottom of the page.  Certain sections could be marked with probing questions for students and they would be able to refer back to a section in the podcast more easily.  I think the ability to ask more critical and higher level thinking questions would be possible with this tool. 

In addition, I believe that this would be easier to talk about sections of the podcast in discussion.  A teacher could say, "refer back to the _____ section of the podcast" and with Innertoob that would be possible with its easy marking system and less confusing than specifying a time.  This tool should be further investigated for use in distance learning programs.   

Distance learning is nothing new.

There have been correspondence courses taught via the mail for decades. The difference today, is the technological means of real-time delivery, if desired or asynchronous delivery of content. Broadband accessibility, the ever decreasing cost of computer hardware, and the relatively new trend toward open source everything has lowered the barriers to entry to a minimum.

 

Economically the concept of computer aided distance learning is an obvious choice for colleges and universities that are trying to compete for tuition dollars of the world. Distance learning allows schools to expand their base of adjunct and visiting professors to a world-wide level. A Nobel Prize winning physicist from Prague doesn’t have to live in Cambridge to teach at MIT. Their course can be designed and developed in an online fashion, so they never have to leave their native land.  This goes for students as well.

 

Courses offered at Yale, MIT, Stanford can be accessed via platforms such as Itunes University, or Blackboard, and students can enroll and participate from their home town. No relocation, no dorm living, much more affordable.

 

Of course, there is something to be said about dorm life. Everyone should experience the surreal life of the freshman dorm: The roommate that plays Nintendo for an entire semester and only leaves the room for meals, and the occasional coed softball game. Or the pre-med dude that stays up all night playing guitar, and never gets tired. There is so much vomit, beer, pizza, and cigarettes that the online student will never experience if they stay home and take their classed online. Some may feel that vomit and cigarettes are over rated, but I think they are an essential part of the freshman experience, amongst many other things I will not mention. No self incrimination here…

 

Here at Quinnipiac, I have personally taken part in 5 online courses; some worked well and some not so well.  The online course inherently lacks the human element. The spontaneity of questioning and lecturing is non-existent. The relationship, though short that develops between students in a class is missing completely. If it were not for the other in-class course I have taken, I would not know anyone in class at all. No faces just email addresses. Not that I came to Quinnipiac to make friends, but I can say I am here partly to network, and partly to engage in discussion and the face to face discourse that gets the mind excited and active. And, if we could all go out and have a few beverages, and someone threw up, that wouldn’t be bad either.

 

There is no getting around the fact that distance learning is the future. Quinnipiac is embracing it. I tunes launched I tunes University, and has schools such as Yale, MIT, Stanford, Duke, etc… the list goes on and on. Currently, many of these schools are offering courses to non-matriculated students, and offering them for free. I would venture to guess that if the numbers are there and a constant and cohesive model can be developed, we will see the shift from free to tuition based courses. But this will be a real challenge.

 

Most academic institutions are built on the academic freedom of faculty members to teach as they see fit, within some limits. Tenure has rightly protected the academic from the pressures of the administration, and ensured the autonomy of the faculty, but this may have to change if there is to be a reliable model for the online program.

 

There are new barriers such as the technological learning curve, for both teacher and student. This of course will diminish as older faculty retire, and are replaced by younger faculty who have literally grown-up with technology as part of their beings. The freshman of 2020 will know Photoshop, Word, Illustrator, Final Cut, and Flash. They will be adept in whatever social networking platform is prevalent; assuming that FaceBook eventually becomes passé. The online movement is occurring at all levels of education, not just the University level. Elementary, Junior High and High Schools are adopting these technologies and teaching methods as well. The K-12 education system will never be entirely online, as those of us with children know, because of the babysitting aspect of school. Our tax dollars pay for roughly, 190 days of educational child care, by trained professionals. Many of those points are debatable, but that is a whole other essay.

 

The future of the classroom is an interesting one. Recently, many schools have been contemplating doing away with tuition as well. The endowments of several schools would allow them to exist, and function fully without tuition at all. Harvard’s endowment is somewhere in the range of $29 Billion dollars. That’s more than the GDP of many African nations.

 

The next generation will be raised with cell phones in hand, and laptops instead of notebooks. They will be ready for the online classroom, and will most likely demand it. It is almost absurd to thin that if you miss a lecture in today’s University, that you couldn’t download a podcast of it complete with Power Point slides, lecture notes, and assignments, but even here at Quinnipiac there are classes where that’s not possible. Academia is not a place of quick change, so I applaud Quinnipiac for the strides that it has made with technology. But, I have a feeling that once the stigma of an “online course” has diminished, and it will, the world of academia is going to ramp up quickly and begin to move at broadband speed.

 

Tjb.

# Bharathiar University Distance Education Correspondence Courses
Admission Notice 2008-09 BA, B.Sc., MBA, BBA, BCA, M.Sc.M.Com, MA, b.Com, MCA

details Bharathiar University Distance Education
# Alagappa University Distance Education Correspondence Courses
Admission 2008 New BA, B.Sc., MBA, BBA, BCA, M.Sc.M.Com, MA, b.Com

Details >> Alagappa University Distance Education Admission 2008

I read an article on Cultivating Social Presence in the Online Learning Classroom:  A Literature Review with Recommendations for Practice by Brandi Scollins-Mantha.  It had some practical ways to help make an online environment more like a face-to-face classroom with respect to social qualities. 

One interesting thing I read in the article is the use of emoticons.  Sometimes showing these can reflect facial expressions and cues that are necessary when not in a face-to-face situation.  However, as always, there is a time and a place appropriate for different forms of communication.  Formal writing should not include these. 

Feedback in a timely manner by the instructor is a necessity.  Without non-verbal cues, students may feel alone and unsure of their place in the virtual classroom.  Adding humor and personal information can help forge a connection.  Having emails sent to check in on how students are doing and audio clips create a social presence.  All of this must be modeled by the instructor.  I never realized there was a method behind my online instructors setting things up like this in Blackboard since I've only taken a few hybrid courses.  But now, in a fully online distance learning course I see the benefit.

Mostly, I'm learning that in order for distance learning to work you must take into consideration the environment.  Just as teachers spend hours doing seating charts, moving furniture for optimal learning, and other environmental changes to a brick and mortar classroom, there must be certain things set in place in a virtual classroom to foster social presence.  Having a social presence is essential in collaborative learning online. 

A June 17, 2008 article by Elizabeth Redden on the Inside Higher Ed website examines Axia College of University of Phoenix. Titled, "A National Community College?" the article provides a thorough look into the two-year associate's degree granting school that now boasts 100,000 enrolled students.  I have excerpted the article below, or you can view the article at it's original home on the Inside Higher Ed website.

The University of Phoenix markets itself as a national private university (and the largest one at that). With more than 100,000 individuals now enrolled in its young two-year degree granting college, Axia, has it morphed into a national community college, too?

“In some ways I guess [Axia] could be considered to be a national community college. That’s not the way we have represented it,” said William J. Pepicello, the University of Phoenix’s president. “Our real thought is it’s a college where the student demographic that it appeals to can come and get a grounding in higher education and have some early success leading to the two-year degree that we hope then will inspire them to go from there.”

Sound a bit like (at least one function of) a community college?

The number of associate degrees awarded by the for-profit Phoenix swelled to 13,000 in 2007, just three years after Axia’s establishment in 2004. The all-online college now offers associate of arts degrees in fields including accounting, communication, health care administration, information technology and paraprofessional education. Students take two courses at a time in nine-week blocks.

Few Axia students are traditional college-aged: Phoenix’s president reports that only 16 to 17 percent are under 22. But the students, many of whom are first-generation college students and 80 percent of whom transfer 15 credits or fewer into Phoenix, differ substantially from the white-collar, mid-career professionals that Phoenix has historically served. In a January conference call on earnings, the president of Apollo Group, Phoenix’s publicly traded parent company, said that while the average Phoenix student is 33 or 34, the average Axia student is 28 or 29, with a lower income. The Axia student is more likely to hold an entry-level job.

Yet, these students are paying more than their peers at community colleges. As of July 1, Axia College courses will cost an average of $325 per credit hour. At public two-year institutions, the College Board calculates that the average annual tuition bill for full-time students is $2,361, which boils down to about $98 per credit for a student taking 24.

But other parallels between the two beasts are striking: Phoenix, much like community colleges, has built a reputation for serving a diverse pool of students who are otherwise underserved in higher education. And the university regards Axia as an entryway into higher education, and yes, the University of Phoenix in particular.

Axia “was a response to a changing demographic at University of Phoenix,” explained Pepicello. The university began as a degree completion institution, in which mid-career professionals with some college experience transferred large numbers of credits and finished off their programs. “What we discovered in the late ’90s and early 2000s, there were lots of students who fit our profile, they were working adults, but they had almost no prior experience in higher education.”

“Why we focused on the associate degree level was that we realized that bringing someone who is older and who has probably been outside education for a number of years, and has no previous college, into a four-year program is very daunting,” Pepicello continued. “If a student needs an associate degree, they can get it, go to work. And they can choose to come back to us — which we hope — for a bachelor’s degree.”

That hope meshes with the business model, which is based on the premise that the associate degree won’t ultimately be sufficient. In the January call, Brian Mueller, Apollo’s president, declined to offer detail on the transfer and completion rates of Axia students moving into Phoenix’s bachelor’s degree programs, saying it was proprietary. But, he said, “That pool of people who can potentially transfer into our bachelor’s program is growing month over month which is a very good thing from our standpoint.”

Asked later in the call whether there “is there any reason why those Axia students would not at some point in time in their growth not want to get a bachelor’s degree,” Mueller replied, “No, I don’t think so.”

“Because if you look at — if you look at the Axia College programs that we have, you will notice that there are a few where there is some direct benefit from having an associate’s degree. There is some increased capability from an income standpoint. But there is still a much greater differentiator at the baccalaureate level and so there’s not — it’s not a scenario where an associate’s degree will give you an opportunity close to or equivalent to a baccalaureate degree so that people would be tempted to stop there. We are not seeing that happen.”

Axia in Context

Given Apollo’s profit motive, Axia, unlike a traditional community college, does not exist in part for the purpose of exporting students to complete their four-year degrees elsewhere. While Phoenix has many articulation agreements for bringing students in, the same can’t be said for students going out. But Axia students graduating with an associate degree will have a regionally accredited credential they could transfer elsewhere on their own — begging the question of what an Axia associate degree means. Where do Axia degrees fit in, both within Phoenix’s own mammoth structure and in higher education’s super-structure more generally?

“It’s not a technical degree; it really is only about helping you into a four-year school,” said Trace A. Urdan, an analyst with the investment group, Signal Hill. He said he wonders about the expectations and outcomes for the two-year online degree itself. Many traditional University of Phoenix students, he pointed out, take courses on the company dime because a supervisor suggests that a M.B.A. might be beneficial, or because they need a credential for a particular promotion.

“Generally speaking they’re not using the University of Phoenix to change the directions of their lives,” said Urdan. Whereas, “the Axia program, I think it’s being pitched as transformative. You’re waiting tables or you’re driving a truck or you’re doing something you don’t like and here’s a chance to move into the business world. I just don’t know. I don’t know what it gets you.”

For those Axia graduates who move on to a Phoenix B.A., “That probably has some value,” Urdan said. “But the two-year associate from University of Phoenix is brand new.”

“You certainly wouldn’t want a two-year degree from a university where there was any doubt about your ability to finish your bachelor’s degree somewhere other than Phoenix, I would think,” said David W. Breneman, a professor of education and head of the University of Virginia’s new Batten School of Public Policy and Leadership. “There are still a lot of institutions that are very reluctant to accept anything from Phoenix.”

At the same time, he added, “There are a number of states where the articulation agreements between the community colleges and four-years are not very good.”

“We know that the United States is falling behind many of the industrialized countries in the world in terms of the percentage of our population that is obtaining higher education. So I think any increased options for higher education are generally good,” said Linda Thor, president of Rio Salado College, an Arizona community college with aggressive online operations (which, incidentally, have caught the attention of a private investor). “That said, it’s very difficult for those of us in public education to compete with the for-profit institutions because we only have a small fraction of the marketing dollars they have available.”

“I think that some students who are enrolling in for-profit institutions may not be aware that comparable programs of comparable quality are available to them at a significantly lower price in the public sector,” continued Thor, who counts the University of Phoenix as a neighbor. “Here’s where somehow we all need to collectively do a better job of educating the consumer about their options.”

“I particularly think it’s a shame for somebody to be coming out of an institution with an associate degree and a significant debt when that same associate degree was available at a public community college at a fraction of the cost.”

Competition

Phoenix’s Pepicello, however, said he doesn’t see Axia in competition with community colleges. “Clearly students have that choice,” he said.

“Many of our students indicate that they might have considered the community college, but that the community college did not particularly have the format they’re looking for.”

“If I were to opine on why students choose us, I think it’s probably ease of access,” Pepicello said, citing small classes (20 students or less in Axia’s case), extensive interaction with faculty and advisers, and the online platform. “In short I think it’s because we tried to design Axia to be something that students can integrate into their lives and I think that resonates.”

Phoenix’s first annual report on academic outcomes, released this month, does not include any data on Axia’s outcomes specifically. It does indicate a 27 percent completion rate for its cohort of associate degree seekers in 2003 (the year before Axia’s establishment), consistent with national norms. In calculating its completion rate, the university used a different formula than the federal standard, which counts only first-time students (who, as the report states, are anomalies at University of Phoenix).

Urdan, of Signal Hill, pointed out that Axia’s growth is consistent with that of other for-profit colleges pursuing the two-year degree market, including Colorado Technical University, owned by Career Education Corp., and American InterContinental University Online. “It’s clear that this new category is very popular,” Urdan said.

“There’s a growing awareness of the importance of the two-year degree on the part of business and industry,” said George R. Boggs, president and CEO of the American Association of Community Colleges. Boggs added that while community college leaders have paid some attention to the expansion of for-profits in the two-year degree market, “I haven’t heard a lot of broad concern about it yet. And I think it’s mainly because community colleges have all they can handle right now.” (Boggs added, too, that community colleges are concerned with many functions beyond conferring associate degrees. Nationally, community colleges award only about 550,000 associate degrees annually, while there are 11.5 million enrollments in U.S. community colleges.)

“There are some things we can all learn from each other,” Boggs said. “For example, Phoenix does one course at a time” [or two, in the case of Axia]. “I think for some students that’s a great model, and some community colleges should be doing that or thinking of doing that, offering classes in a more compressed mode.”

“We can’t completely emulate for-profits because in many ways they have a lot more resources. They charge a lot more money and can devote more time to following students into the job market, for example,” Boggs said.

“It just shows there’s competition out there and big companies like Apollo are interested in serving this audience and think they can be competitive,” said Sean Gallagher, program director and senior analyst for Eduventures, a research and consulting firm for higher education. “It just means that community colleges need to be more flexible in their offerings and be aware of the competition.”

Applications are invited on prescribed form for admission to B.Tech (Distance Education) programme in Civil, Computer Science, Electrical and Mechanical Engineering. The admission will be offered through Entrance Test to be held at Patiala, Delhi, Hyderabad, Pune, Mumbai and Bangalore on 31 August 2008.

Details Thapar University B.Tech Distance Education Admission 2008

The B.Ed Programme offered by Indira Gandhi National Open University ( IGNOU ) is an innovative programme utilizing self instructional materials and information technology along with interactive personal contact programmes.

The admission to this programme is on the basis of an Entrance Test to be conducted on Sunday the August 17, 2008 all over the country.

For more details visit IGNOU B.Ed. Entrance Test

Movie-Making at CSD

June 26th, 2008

   

Today was the final of three days in Movie-Making in the Classroom: Creating Digital Stories and Photo Essays (June 23, 24 & 26 in the tele). Martha & Stacey taught the class, and Karen Montgomery was on hand. Participants had their choice of using Windows MovieMaker (PC), iMovie (Mac), or PhotoStory 3 (PC) to create their movie.

The common misconception is that you have to be tech savvy and completely online to take the benefits of technology. The truth is technology is merely a tool to enhance your current physical structures and operations. Just like you don’t have to be an auto mechanic to drive a car similarly you don’t have to be software professional to take benefits of technology.

The Diagram below explains how technology can benefit

So if you are an Institute, Coaching Centre, Publisher, Administrator or an individual from the field of education technology has the right kind of tools that without disturbing your present setup can help you achieve exponential growth.

People often ask why I need technology, I am comfortable the way I am, and I do not need to change this is a normal reaction as people fear technology. The truth is that technology, it is our friend, and Ignorance is the enemy. We fear the wrong thing - We fear new technology and deny ourselves rich benefits technology provides.

Today Students (consumers) use engaging technologies in collaborative enquiry based learning environments with teachers who are willing and able to use technology power to help them in transforming knowledge and skills into products, solutions and new information. Today these students who are trying to seek instant answers make 2.7 billion searches on Google. Since students already know how to use this technology, it makes one wonder why aren't you using it to teach them

One cannot imagine direct benefits technology can bring to an organization or an individual in education just to list few

 Fulfillment of customer need
 Customer satisfaction
 Capture of new markets
 Fresh avenues of incomes on practically zero investments
 Increased productivity at lower cost
 Better Management
 Increased Profits
 And many more…

Growing Rupeehelps organizations and individuals by showing them the correct path. It chalks out complete success plans that include what to do, when to do and how to do it for more information get in touch with us on mail info@growingrupee.com or call 0-9871736060

Professors go Online

June 26th, 2008

ICT (Information Communication Technology) has had a significant impact on higher education as, both professors and students find rich and rewarding ways to teach and learn, an enthralling experience for both with rich multimedia content and new forms of communication. Technology aided learning has become part of daily life

With Institutes worldwide forming their intranets, Extranets and knowledge networks being created, education itself is evolving into new dimension, Technology is changing the very basics of how knowledge is conceived, developed and consumed.

Today education for students is Whatever Whenever, Wherever, as Students use engaging technologies in collaborative enquiry based learning environments with teachers who are willing and able to use technology power to help them in transforming knowledge and skills into products, solutions and new information, professors find themselves into a new role.

It is advocated the average students of today will have 10-14 jobs that do not currently have an existence. The students look towards their professors to get them prepared for a world of tomorrow. Students were born into a digital world where they expect to be able to create, consume, remix, and share material with others - The professors have to be on the same platform to reach the students. Globally professors are aligning the modern needs as they adopt tools that make textbooks go alive and move towards collaborative way of learning.

Professors go online as technology has opened multiple avenues for professors that were not possible decade a go, avenues that bring higher satisfaction level with professional growth and financial rewards.

Growing Rupee introduces to professors  ways of utilizing their knowledge and skills for professional and financial benefits.